Idee polityczne a rozwój polityki bezpieczeństwa i obrony Unii Europejskiej

Authors

Pages

6-21

Abstract

Celem artykułu jest analiza roli idei politycznych w rozwoju Wspólnej Polityki Bezpieczeństwa i Obrony UE. Podstawą teoretyczną analizy jest teoria konstruktywistyczna, a szczególnie „metoda konstruktywistyczna” rozwoju integracji. Analiza i wnioski odnoszą się do trzech głównych funkcji wspomnianej metody, tj. konstruowania rzeczywistości, maskowania rzeczywistości oraz legitymizowania rzeczywistości politycznej i gospodarczej w ramach procesów integracyjnych.

  • Barrinha A. 2016. “The EDA and the discursive construction of European defence and security”, in: The European Defence Agency. Arming Europe, N. Karampekios, I. Oikonomou (eds.), London – New York: Routledge: 27–43.
  • Bàtora J. 2009. “European Defence Agency: A Flashpoint of Institutional Logics”, West European Politics, Vol. 32, No. 6: 1075–1098.
  • Bull H. 1982. “Civilian Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?” Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 21, No. 2: 149–170.
  • Buzan B., Wæver Ole, de Wilde Jaap. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
  • Chazan G., Manson, Katrina. 2018. “US concerned European plan to spend more on defence risks ‘weakening transatlantic bond”, Financial Times, 19.02.:3.
  • Clift B., Woll C. 2012. “Economic patriotism: reinventing control over open markets”, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 19, No. 3: 307–323.
  • Cogan C.G. 2001. The Third Option. The Emancipation of European Defense, 1989–2000, Westport: Praeger Publishers.
  • Diez T., Manners, Ian James. 2007. “Reflecting on normative power Europe”, in: Power in World Politics, F. Berenskoetter, M.J. Williams (eds.), London – New York: Rutledge, 173–188.
  • Duke S., Vanhoonacker, S. 2016. “EU-NATO relations. Top-down strategic paralysis, bottmup cooperation”, in: The EU, Strategy and Security Policy. Regional and strategic challenges, L. Chappell, J. Mawdsley, P. Petrov (eds.), New York: Routledge, 153–169.
  • Edwards J. 2011. “The EU Defence and Security Procurement Directive: A Step Towards Aff ordability?” International Security Programme Paper, 2011/05, Chatham House, London.
  • Galeotti M. 2017. “Trump Was Right: NATO is Obsolete”, Foreign Policy, 20 July, https:// foreignpolicy.com/2017/07/20/trump-nato-hybrid-warfare-hybrid-defense-russia-putin/ [dostęp: 29.09.2018].
  • Gebhard C., Smith S.J. 2015. “The Two Faces of EU-NATO cooperation: Counter-piracy operations off the Somali coast”, Cooperation and Confl ict, Vol. 50, No. 1: 107–127.
  • Pancevski B. 2017. “Germany slams ‘intimidating’ £300bn White House bill”, The Sunday Times, 26 March, https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/germany-dismisses-white-housesintimidating- 300bn-bill-for-defence-dl7dk629k [dostęp: 27.08.2018].
  • Gilpin R. 2001. Global Political Economy Understanding the International Economic Order, New York: Princeton University Press.
  • Grosse T.G. 2010. „Systemowe uwarunkowania słabości polityki zagranicznej Unii Europejskiej”, Studia Europejskie, nr 1 (53): 33–66.
  • Grosse T.G. 2014. W poszukiwaniu geoekonomii w Europie, Warszawa: Instytut Studiów Politycznych PAN.
  • Grosse T.G. 2014/2015. „Trzy oblicza konstruktywizmu w Europie. Rozważania o kryzysie metody integracyjnej”, Chrześcijaństwo-Świat-Polityka, nr 17/18: 35–50.
  • Grosse T.G. 2016. „Konstruowanie rzeczywistości jako metoda integracji europejskiej. Przykład Parlamentu Europejskiego”, w: Zastosowanie konstruktywizmu w studiach europejskich, J. Czaputowicz (red.), Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego: 87–105.
  • Grosse T. G. 2018. “Germany’s strategy and tactics towards the crisis in European integration”, in: Visions and Revisions of Europe, K. Czerska-Shaw, M. Galent, B. Gierat-Bieroń (eds.), Goettingen: Goettingen University Press, 9–24.
  • Grosse T.G. 2019. “Changes in EU single market in the aft ermath of the crises”, Studia Polityczne, w druku.
  • Guay T., Callum R.. 2002. “The transformation and future prospects of Europe’s defence industry”, International Affairs, Vol. 78, No. 4: 757–776.
  • Herszenhorn D.M., Bayer L., Barigazzi J. 2018. “EU, founded as project of peace, plans military future”, Politico, 30.08., https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-founded-as-project-of-peacedebates- a-militarized-future-nato-european-defense-fund-russia/ [dostęp: 29.09.2018].
  • Heuninckx B. 2017. The Law of Collaborative Defence Procurement in the European Union, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hoeffle C. 2012. “European armament co-operation and the renewal of industrial policy motives”, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 19, No. 3: 435–451.
  • Ikegami M. 2013. “The end of a ‘national’ defence industry? Impacts of globalization on the Swedish defence industry”, Scandinavian Journal of History, Vol. 38, No. 4: 436–475.
  • Initiative pour l’Europe – Discours d’Emmanuel Macron pour une Europe souveraine, unie, démocratique, 26 Septembre 2017, Paris, http://www.elysee.fr/declarations/article/ initiative-pour-l-europe-discours-d-emmanuel-macron-pour-une-europe-souveraineunie- democratique/ [dostęp: 30.09.2018].
  • James A.D. 2006. “The Transatlantic Defence R&D Gap: Causes, Consequences and Controversies”, Defence and Peace Economics, Vol. 17, No. 3: 223–238.
  • Jones S.G. 2006. “The Rise of European Defense”, Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 121, No. 2: 241–267.
  • Karnitschnig M. 2018. „Transatlantic tensions spill into view at security gathering”, Politico, 16.02., https://www.politico.eu/article/defense-europe-transatlantic-tensions-spill-intoview- at-security-gathering/ [dostęp: 29.09.2018].
  • Krotz U. 2011. Flying Tiger: International Relations Theory and the Politics of Advanced Weapons, Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Maas H. 2018. “Making plans for a new world order”, Handelsblatt Global, 22 August, https:// global.handelsblatt.com/opinion/making-plans-new-world-order-germany-us-trumptrans- atlantic-relations-heiko-maas-europe-956306 [dostęp: 29.09.2018].
  • MacAskill A., Rose M. 2018. “Britain, EU clash in growing row over Galileo satellite project”, Reuters, 14.05., https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu-galileo/britain-eu-clashin- growing-row-over-galileo-satellite-project-idUSKCN1IF264 [dostęp: 29.09.2018].
  • Manson K., Peel M. 2018. “US fears EU Defence plan puts Nato at risk”, Financial Times, 13.02.: 2.
  • Markusen A., Serfati C. 2000. “Remaking the Military Industrial Relationship: A French- American Comparison”, Defence and Peace Economics, Vol. 11: 271–299.
  • Menon A. 2009. “Empowering paradise? The ESDP at ten”, International Aff airs, Vol. 85, No. 2: 227–246.
  • Mörth U., Britz M. 2004. “European Integration as Organizing: The Case of Armaments”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 42, No 5: 957–973.
  • Platzgummer P. 2016. “The EDA and defence off sets. Trailing after the Commission”, in: The European Defence Agency. Arming Europe, N. Karampekios, I. Oikonomou (eds.), London – New York: Routledge, 223–240.
  • Posaner J. 2018. „Brexit Britain’s satellite threat falls flat with Brussels”, Politico, 8.05., https:// www.politico.eu/article/brexit-galileo-navigational-satellite-system-britain-eu-satellitethreat- falls-fl at-with-brussels/ [dostęp: 29.09.2018].
  • Rettman A. 2018. “EU should end foreign policy vetoes, Germany says”, Euobserver, 1.03., https://euobserver.com/foreign/141158 [dostęp: 29.09.2018].
  • Sangiovanni M. E. 2003. “Why a Common Security and Defence Policy is Bad for Europe”, Survival, The International Institute for Strategic Studies, Vol. 45, No 3: 193–206.
  • Schilde K. 2017a. “European Military Capabilities: Enablers and Constraints on EU Power?” Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 55, No. 1: 37–53.
  • Schilde K. 2017b. Political Economy of European Security, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schmitt B. 2000. From cooperation to integration: defence and aerospace industries in Europe, Institute for Security Studies, Chaillot Paper, Paris.
  • Selden Z. 2010. “Power is always in fashion: State-centric realism and the European Security and Defence Policy”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 48, No. 2: 397–416.
  • Smith K. E. 2000. “The End of Civilian Power EU: A Welcome Demise or Cause for Concern?” The International Spectator, Vol. 35, No. 2: 11–28.
  • Smith M.E. 2017. Europe’s Common Security and Defence Policy. Capacity-Building, Experiential Learning, and Institutional Change, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Teffer P. 2018. “Defence fi rms ‘reap benefi ts’ of advice to EU”, EUobserver, 23.05., https:// euobserver.com/science/141859 [dostęp: 29.09.2018].
  • Toje A. 2011. “The European Union as a Small Power”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 49, No. 1: 43–60.
  • Trybus M. 2014. Buying Defence and Security in Europe. The EU Defence and Security Procurement Directive in Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Valášek T. 2018. “European defense vs. NATO: Not the right fight”, Politico, 16.02., https://www. politico.eu/article/european-defense-vs-nato-not-the-right-fi ght/ [dostęp: 29.09.2018].
  • Weiss M. 2012. „Transaction Costs and the Establishment of the European Security and Defense Policy”, Security Studies, Vol. 21, No. 4: 654–682.
  • Wniosek Dyrektywa Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady w sprawie niektórych przepisów regulujących dochodzenie roszczeń odszkodowawczych z tytułu naruszenia prawa konkurencji państw członkowskich i Unii Europejskiej, objęte przepisami prawa krajowego, COM/2013/0404 fi nal, CELEX: 52013PC0404, Strasburg 11.06.2013.